Interim Govt Responds to Vandalism at Dhanmondi 32

The interim government has described the vandalism at House No 32 in Dhanmondi as an unfortunate and undesirable event.

In a statement issued on Thursday (February 6) afternoon by the Press Wing of the Chief Advisor, the government acknowledged the incident, attributing it to public outrage over recent remarks made by fugitive Sheikh Hasina from India regarding the July uprising.

The statement emphasized that no attacks or destruction had occurred at House No 32 in the past six months. However, last night's events were a reaction to Sheikh Hasina's provocative statements, which, according to the government, had two key aspects:

• Disrespecting the Martyrs of the July Uprising – Sheikh Hasina's comments were seen as an insult to those who sacrificed their lives in the movement. The government accused her of making false, inflammatory, and dismissive remarks about the martyrs, provoking widespread public anger.
• Continued Threats Despite Exile – Even after fleeing the country, Sheikh Hasina continues to use a confrontational and threatening tone against the July uprising and its participants. The government claimed that she is attempting to destabilize Bangladesh by inciting unrest from abroad.

The interim government reiterated its commitment to protecting public safety and maintaining law and order. It assured that law enforcement agencies are actively working to control the situation and prevent further escalation.

The statement further noted that Sheikh Hasina, as a fugitive and a warrant-listed accused of crimes against humanity, should refrain from making statements that incite unrest. The government urged India not to allow its territory to be used for activities that could destabilize Bangladesh and called for restrictions on Sheikh Hasina's ability to make public statements.

Additionally, the government reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring justice for the victims of the July massacre, stating that trials of those responsible are progressing. Legal actions will also be considered against individuals engaging in incitement or disruptive activities.